which is better the north carolina or the alabama world of warships

Lots of exposed 25mm hull and deck sections for a Soviet battleship, leaving her quite vulnerable to large caliber AP overmatch and HE shells, especially from long-distance fire. Good concealment with a surface detection as low as 12.2km.Įxposed citadel sitting high over the waterline. Large caliber AA guns have a 6km range and do good damage. Quick-firing main battery guns with a 28s reload - this is especially fast for a Soviet battleship.Įxcellent AP penetration values for a 356mm gun.

Soviet Damage Control Party - trivialize those fires today! Good anti-torpedo protection with a 33% damage reduction.

Looks can be deceiving.ĭecent armour profile with extended waterline belt and thick upper hull armour. She didn't have a massive superstructure which brought to my mind two things:Ģ.) Her main battery gun range is probably going to suck with her range finders placed so low.Īs it turns out, I was kinda-sorta correct in the first part (though not to the degree her looks would imply) and the latter didn't matter at all, because BALANS.

When I first looked at Poltava, what struck me immediately was how sleek and low-lying she appeared. Please be aware that her performance may change in the future. To the best of my knowledge, the statistics presented here are accurate as of patch 0.8.10. Wargaming provided me this ship for review purposes - I didn't have to pay for this thing. The following is a review of the Soviet Battleship Poltava.

Which is better the north carolina or the alabama world of warships